|
1
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
- Incumbent telephone and cable operators provide limited broadband
services in the community at high rates and a municipal system would
improve availability and increase competition.
- Municipalities can leverage such networks to obtain lower cost
communications services by serving as an “anchor tenant.”
- Wireless networks are more cost effective than installing wire-line
systems.
- Installing a wireless system will spur economic development and/or help
retain local business and telecommuters.
- Political accountability will minimize the risk of wasteful decisions in
constructing the network.
|
|
4
|
- A government run system will not perform at the level of private
enterprise.
- Once built a municipality may have an incentive to prohibit others from
entering the rights of way to maintain a competitive advantage.
- Wireless broadband is not a “natural monopoly” similar to water and
electric service and there already exists competition in the
broadband marketplace.
- Municipalities are inefficient in adopting new technologies demanded in
the marketplace.
- Taxpayers will be forced to finance the system and will shoulder the
burden if the network fails to meet estimates.
|
|
5
|
- Non-profit
- Private Contract
- Public/Private Partnership
- Municipal Ownership Model
|
|
6
|
- Scope of work
- Project schedule
- Payments/pricing
- Schedule of fees
- Service level agreement
|
|
7
|
- A 10-year fixed rate of $19.95 for 1-3 megabit residential service.
- USI will provide $500,000 to create a Digital Inclusion Fund (“DIF”)
that will be used to promote affordable Internet access, low-cost
hardware, local content and training.
- USI will direct a minimum of 5% of the network’s net profits to the DIF
for ongoing digital inclusion efforts.
In total, an estimated $11 million will be provided to the DIF
over the 10 year term of the contract.
- Free service will be available in specified public locations, such as
parks and plazas in Minneapolis.
|
|
8
|
- A free “walled garden” level of service will be available to people
throughout the City for neighborhood, government and community services
information.
- Designated community technology centers will receive free wireless
access.
- Minimum service levels must be maintained on the network or USI will be
subject to enforcement penalties from the City.
- Mandatory wholesale requirements and pricing to encourage open access to
the network.
- Completion of the Minneapolis network is expected by the end of 2007.
|
|
9
|
- Dispute Escalation procedure
- Outage credits
- Termination
|
|
10
|
- 2-3 hr $100/node
- 3 hr+ $500/node
- $50,000 cap/month
- $250,000 cap for consecutive outages
|
|
11
|
- 60 minutes = up to $50,000/day
- $250,000 cap for given outage
- Uncured for 72 hours
- third party cure – operator pays
- termination
|
|
12
|
- 1-3 Mbps 95% outdoor / 90% indoor
- High rise coverage may be met with other transport capability
- Municipal vehicle
- 1-3 Mbps 95% outdoor coverage
- Force majeure clause
|
|
13
|
|